Skip to main content

"Give me a project I can work on, Steven!" OK, here you go....

Probably once a month, I receive an email from a programmer who either wants to tune up their Oracle Database programming skills (SQL and PL/SQL, primarily) or wants to help me or the community in some way.

Here's the latest, via LinkedIn Messages:

My friends and I are just in love with Oracle PL/SQL and the whole concept of database development and database design. This is like a religion for us. Can you you provide us some work to do?


I don't have a handy set of projects for people to work on, especially now that I am back with Oracle.

But there are plenty of opportunities for you out there, especially if you'd like to help build community tools. So here's a short list. I hope readers will offer others via the Comments section.

1. OraOpenSource - github.com/oraopensource

A project of oraopensource.com, led by Martin Giffy D'Souza, this repo offers an ever-growing set of utilities, with lots of room for expansion.




2. utPLSQL - github.com/utplsql

utPLSQL, which I originally built in 1999, is one of the most popular xUnit variants (JUnit, NUnit, etc.) for PL/SQL developers. It has recently moved to Github and is in the process of being revamped for a big V3 release. It's all written in PL/SQL!

3. oddGen - oddgen.org

oddgen is an Oracle SQL Developer extension to invoke dictionary-driven code generators.



4. Alexandria Library - https://github.com/mortenbra/alexandria-plsql-utils

This library is a collection of various utility packages for PL/SQL, as well as links to useful libraries hosted and maintained elsewhere.

Two more great resources, though you have to come up with your own project ideas to use them:

1. I encourage you sign up for an apex.oracle.com workspace. You can then build your own websites using  Oracle Application Express, using nothing but SQL, PL/SQL and some Javascript if you want to get fancy.

2. Use LiveSQL.oracle.com to play around with SQL and PL/SQL, as well as take advantage of an ever-growing library of scripts.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Quick Guide to User-Defined Types in Oracle PL/SQL

A Twitter follower recently asked for more information on user-defined types in the PL/SQL language, and I figured the best way to answer is to offer up this blog post. PL/SQL is a strongly-typed language . Before you can work with a variable or constant, it must be declared with a type (yes, PL/SQL also supports lots of implicit conversions from one type to another, but still, everything must be declared with a type). PL/SQL offers a wide array of pre-defined data types , both in the language natively (such as VARCHAR2, PLS_INTEGER, BOOLEAN, etc.) and in a variety of supplied packages (e.g., the NUMBER_TABLE collection type in the DBMS_SQL package). Data types in PL/SQL can be scalars, such as strings and numbers, or composite (consisting of one or more scalars), such as record types, collection types and object types. You can't really declare your own "user-defined" scalars, though you can define subtypes  from those scalars, which can be very helpful from the p

The differences between deterministic and result cache features

 EVERY once in a while, a developer gets in touch with a question like this: I am confused about the exact difference between deterministic and result_cache. Do they have different application use cases? I have used deterministic feature in many functions which retrieve data from some lookup tables. Is it essential to replace these 'deterministic' key words with 'result_cache'?  So I thought I'd write a post about the differences between these two features. But first, let's make sure we all understand what it means for a function to be  deterministic. From Wikipedia : In computer science, a deterministic algorithm is an algorithm which, given a particular input, will always produce the same output, with the underlying machine always passing through the same sequence of states.  Another way of putting this is that a deterministic subprogram (procedure or function) has no side-effects. If you pass a certain set of arguments for the parameters, you will always get

How to Pick the Limit for BULK COLLECT

This question rolled into my In Box today: In the case of using the LIMIT clause of BULK COLLECT, how do we decide what value to use for the limit? First I give the quick answer, then I provide support for that answer Quick Answer Start with 100. That's the default (and only) setting for cursor FOR loop optimizations. It offers a sweet spot of improved performance over row-by-row and not-too-much PGA memory consumption. Test to see if that's fast enough (likely will be for many cases). If not, try higher values until you reach the performance level you need - and you are not consuming too much PGA memory.  Don't hard-code the limit value: make it a parameter to your subprogram or a constant in a package specification. Don't put anything in the collection you don't need. [from Giulio Dottorini] Remember: each session that runs this code will use that amount of memory. Background When you use BULK COLLECT, you retrieve more than row with each fetch,